Home >

Yantai Wanhua Has Been Traced To China'S Clothing &Nbsp, And Intermediaries Have Made Low-Grade Mistakes Again.

2011/12/9 14:12:00 10

Yantai'S Mistake As A Chinese Clothing Agency

Should the shareholders' meeting convened by Wanhua in Yantai issue legal advice according to the company's articles of association of Chinese clothing? Just like the wave of Haitong Securities's "sponsoring Oolong" has not yet dissipated, such a ridiculous scene is now in again.

Beijing

City Hall law firm again staged.

In December 7th, the first extraordinary general meeting held in Yantai in 2011 was deliberated and adopted a series of motions, such as the proposal to build an integrated project of propylene oxide and acrylates.

But in the first paragraph of the legal opinion issued by the shareholders' meeting in Beijing City, the name of "Chinese clothing" appeared in the Shenzhen listed company.

"Beijing Hua Tang law firm accepts the Commission of Yantai Wanhua polyurethane Limited by Share Ltd......"

According to the company law of the People's Republic of China...

As well as the relevant provisions of the articles of association of China's clothing Limited by Share Ltd, convening, convening procedures and attending the meeting of shareholders of this company.

Qualifications

We shall issue legal opinions on the voting procedures and voting results. "

Yantai Wanhua, Chinese clothing, the two companies for short, whether they are in different shapes or pronunciations, there is no possibility of writing errors.

The reporter noted that before the Yantai Wanhua, Beijing hall in November 24th this year also issued a relevant legal opinion for the Chinese clothing shareholders' meeting.

In addition, the contents of the first paragraph of the two submissions were surprisingly consistent except for a slight change in the name of the listed company and the life of the appointed lawyer.

Obviously, Beijing Hua Tang has slack off in the process of making legal submissions, plagiarizing the outline of Chinese clothing, but the relevant details have not been dealt with cleanly.

The outrageous operation of Beijing's hate hall is reminiscent of not too long ago.

Haitong

The sponsor's "Oolong incident".

Haitong Securities, as a listed sponsor of Dao Ming optics, has also made the market's "uproar" wrong by writing "Dao Ming optics" into another listed company, Yao Chi poker.

It is worth mentioning that after the Haitong incident, the Shenzhen stock exchange immediately issued a reminder to the sponsors about the effective implementation of the duty of sponsoring and improving the quality of issuing and listing work, and put forward four requirements for sponsoring agencies and sponsor representatives: strengthening staff's sense of responsibility, sorting out their business and improving their business processes, establishing a duplicate checking system for sending and uploading documents, and establishing strict internal accountability mechanisms.

Not only that, Haitong Securities's error behavior has also aroused the concern of the SFC.

In less than a month, two intermediaries continued.

mechanism

It is obvious that "low level mistakes" which make the outside world incomprehensible have been explained by "negligence" and "contingency".

Behind the absurd and absurd appearance of operation, the deeper level is the interrogation of the professional ethics of intermediary organizations, reflecting the serious lack of responsibility of intermediaries.